Life is a Roller Coaster

June 29, 2008

Estimated I.Q. of Famous People

Filed under: Sharing — adisubrata @ 12:10 AM

Most of famous people have a good I.O :)

Below is the list:

Name Descripton Country IQ
Leonardo da Vinci Universal Genius Italy 220
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe – Germany 210
Emanuel Swedenborg – Sweden 205
Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz – Germany 205
Hugo Grotius Writer Holland 200
John Stuart Mill Universal Genius England 200
Kim Ung-Yong – Korea 200
Sir Francis Galton Scientist & doctor England 200
Thomas Wolsey Politician England 200
William James Sidis – USA 200
Blaise Pascal Mathematician & religious philosopher France 195
Christopher Langan Bouncer & scientist & philosopher USA 195
George H. Choueiri A.C.E Leader Lebanon 195
Sarpi Councilor & theologian & historian Italy 195
Albrecht von Haller Medical scientist Switzerland 190
Arnauld Theologian France 190
Friedrich von Schelling Philosopher Germany 190
Garry Kasparov Chess player Russia 190
George Berkeley Philosopher Ireland 190
Ludwig Wittgenstein Philosopher Austria 190
Philip Emeagwali Mathematician Nigeria 190
Phillipp Melanchthon Humanist & theologian Germany 190
PierreSimon de Laplace Astronomer & mathematician France 190
Sir Isaac Newton Scientist England 190
Voltaire Writer France 190
William Pitt (the Younger) Politician England 190
Bobby Fischer Chess player USA 187
Marilyn vos Savant Writer USA 186
Galileo Galilei Physicist & astronomer & philosopher Italy 185
Joseph Louis Lagrange Mathematician & astronomer Italy/France 185
Ren Descartes Mathematician & philosopher France 185
Alexander Pope Poet & writer England 180
Arne Beurling Mathematician Sweden 180
Benjamin Netanyahu Israeli Prime Minister Israel 180
Buonarroti Michelangelo Artist, poet & architect Italy 180
Charles Dickens Writer England 180
David Hume Philosopher & politician Scotland 180
James Woods Actor USA 180
John H. Sununu Chief of Staff for President Bush USA 180
Lord Byron Poet & writer England 180
Madame de Stael Novelist & philosopher France 180
Thomas Chatterton Poet & writer England 180
Baruch Spinoza Philosopher Holland 175
Immanuel Kant Philosopher Germany 175
Johannes Kepler Mathematician, physicist & astronomer Germany 175
Andrew J. Wiles Mathematician England 170
Donald Byrne Chess Player Irland 170
Dr David Livingstone Explorer & doctor Scotland 170
George Friedrich H?ndel Composer Germany 170
Hypatia Philosopher & mathematician Alexandria 170
Johann Strauss Composer Germany 170
Judith Polgar Chess player Hungary 170
Martin Luther Theorist Germany 170
Plato Philosopher Greece 170
Raphael Artist Italy 170
Richard Wagner Composer Germany 170
Robert Byrne Chess Player Irland 170
Sofia Kovalevskaya Mathematician & writer Sweden/Russia 170
Carl von Linn Botanist Sweden 165
Charles Darwin Naturalist England 165
Felix Mendelssohn Composer Germany 165
Friedrich Hegel Philosopher Germany 165
James Watt Physicist & technician Scotland 165
Johann Sebastian Bach Composer Germany 165
JohnLocke Philosopher England 165
Ludwig van Beethoven Composer Germany 165
Truman Cloak – – 165
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Composer Austria 165
Jola Sigmond Teacher Sweden 161
Albert Einstein Physicist USA 160
Benjamin Franklin Writer, scientist & politician USA 160
Bill Gates CEO, Microsoft USA 160
Dolph Lundgren Actor Sweden 160
George Eliot (Mary Ann Evans) Writer England 160
James Cook Explorer England 160
Joseph Haydn Composer Austria 160
Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomer Poland 160
Paul Allen Microsoft cofounder USA 160
Stephen W. Hawking Physicist England 160
Sir Clive Sinclair Inventor England 159
Anthonis van Dyck Artist Belgium 155
Honor de Balzac Writer France 155
Jonathan Swift Writer & theologian England 155
Miguel de Cervantes Writer Spain 155
Ralph Waldo Emerson Writer USA 155
Rembrandt van Rijn Artist Holland 155
Sharon Stone Actress USA 154
John Quincy Adams President USA 153
George Sand Writer France 150
Rousseau Writer France 150
Jayne Mansfield – USA 149
Bonaparte Napoleon Emperor France 145
H. C. Anderson Writer Denmark 145
Hjalmar Schacht Nazi officer Germany 143
Richard Nixon Ex-President USA 143
Adolf Hitler Nazi leader Germany 141
Geena Davis Actress USA 140
Hillary Clinton Ex-President wife USA 140
Jean M. Auel Writer Canada 140
Madonna Singer USA 140
Shakira Singer Colombia 140
Thomas Jefferson President USA 138
Bill(William) J. Clinton President USA 137
John Adams President USA 137
Arnold Schwarzenegger Actor Austria 135
Al Gore Politician USA 134
Jodie Foster Actor USA 132
Nicole Kidman Actor USA 132
Abraham Lincoln President USA 128
George W. Bush President USA 125
Andrew Jackson President USA 123
George Washington President USA 118
John F. Kennedy Ex-President USA 117
Ulysses S. Grant President USA 110
Andy Warhol Pop artist USA 86

June 28, 2008

How long you can survive??

Filed under: General — adisubrata @ 5:56 AM

This router has survive without restart for almost 3 years :D

Nice !!!!

hidden@hidden> show chassis routing-engine
Routing Engine status:
Slot 0:
Current state                  Master
Election priority              Master
Temperature                 35 degrees C / 95 degrees F
CPU temperature             37 degrees C / 98 degrees F
DRAM                      2048 MB
Memory utilization          17 percent
CPU utilization:
User                       5 percent
Background                 0 percent
Kernel                     4 percent
Interrupt                  2 percent
Idle                      90 percent
Model                          RE-4.0
Serial ID                      P11123902724
Start time                     2005-11-28 16:15:14 JAVT
Uptime                        942 days, 13 hours, 34 minutes, 56 seconds

Load averages:                 1 minute   5 minute  15 minute
0.45       0.51       0.49

June 19, 2008

LDP Traffic Statistic

Filed under: Technical section — Tags: , — adisubrata @ 9:53 PM

Juniper router M-series put the LDP or RSVP prefix into inet.3 tables and label distribution into mpls.0 table. By default, only BGP can access inet.3 table. BGP used inet.3 prefix to map as a next-hop. There is no chance for unicast protocols like OSPF, IS-IS, etc to access inet.3 table.

If we have MPLS clouds which are contain P and PE routers, each PE and P routers connected thru unicast protocols, I.e OSPF, ISIS. So, all traffic coming to PE2 from source address PE1 will be directed through OSPF. No MPLS label needed to forwards those packets.

It’s a bit different to another vendor which is automatically enabling MPLS packets once MPLS turn on. Juniper M-series automatically enabling MPLS label to forwarding VRF traffic to another VRF since the protocols used from PE to PE is BGP.

There are available knobs to moving prefix from inet.3 to inet.0 as shown below:

enugadi@m7i# set protocols mpls traffic-engineering ?
Possible completions:
bgp                  BGP destinations only
bgp-igp              BGP and IGP destinations
bgp-igp-both-ribs    BGP and IGP destinations with routes in both routing tables
mpls-forwarding      Use MPLS routes for forwarding, not routing

This knob above allowing unicast protocols (I.e OSPF, ISIS etc) to use MPLS label.
This label tracing guidance below will use simple topology and moved inet.3 into inet.0 table.

r1: 1.1.1.1/32
r2: 2.2.2.2/32
r3: 3.3.3.3/32
r4: 4.4.4.4/32
r5: 5.5.5.5/32

r1-r2: 10.0.0.0/30
r2-r3: 11.0.0.0/30
r3-r4: 12.0.0.0/30
r4-r5: 13.0.0.0/30

LDP session MUST in Operational State and the connection is OPEN (RFC 3036).

The IGP is OSPF single area.

====================================================
enugadi@m7i# run show route logical-router r1
inet.0: 12 destinations, 16 routes (12 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
1.1.1.1/32         *[Direct/0] 11:34:27
                    > via lo0.1
2.2.2.2/32         *[LDP/9] 03:25:36, metric 1
                    > to 10.0.0.2 via ge-0/0/0.1
                    [OSPF/10] 07:32:26, metric 1
                    > to 10.0.0.2 via ge-0/0/0.1
3.3.3.3/32         *[LDP/9] 03:25:36, metric 1
                    > to 10.0.0.2 via ge-0/0/0.1, Push 299888
                    [OSPF/10] 03:30:55, metric 2
                    > to 10.0.0.2 via ge-0/0/0.1
4.4.4.4/32         *[LDP/9] 03:25:36, metric 1
                    > to 10.0.0.2 via ge-0/0/0.1, Push 299904
                    [OSPF/10] 03:30:55, metric 3
                    > to 10.0.0.2 via ge-0/0/0.1
5.5.5.5/32         *[LDP/9] 01:22:04, metric 1
                    > to 10.0.0.2 via ge-0/0/0.1, Push 299936
                    [OSPF/10] 03:30:55, metric 4
                    > to 10.0.0.2 via ge-0/0/0.1
10.0.0.0/30        *[Direct/0] 11:34:27
                    > via ge-0/0/0.1
                    10.0.0.1/32        *[Local/0] 11:34:27
                    Local via ge-0/0/0.1
11.0.0.0/30        *[OSPF/10] 07:32:26, metric 2
                    > to 10.0.0.2 via ge-0/0/0.1
                    12.0.0.0/30        *[OSPF/10] 03:30:55, metric 3
                    > to 10.0.0.2 via ge-0/0/0.1
13.0.0.0/30        *[OSPF/10] 03:30:55, metric 4
                    > to 10.0.0.2 via ge-0/0/0.1
                    192.168.150.0/24   *[OSPF/10] 03:30:55, metric 3
                    > to 10.0.0.2 via ge-0/0/0.1
224.0.0.5/32       *[OSPF/10] 07:33:16, metric 1
MultiRecv
====================================================
enugadi@m7i# run show ldp session logical-router r1
Address           State        Connection     Hold time
2.2.2.2             Operational  Open             21
====================================================
enugadi@m7i# run show ldp database logical-router r1  <- label received r1
Input label database, 1.1.1.1:0--2.2.2.2:0
Label     Prefix
299872     1.1.1.1/32
3          2.2.2.2/32
299888     3.3.3.3/32
299904     4.4.4.4/32
299920     5.5.5.5/32
Output label database, 1.1.1.1:0--2.2.2.2:0 <- label sent from r1 to r2
Label     Prefix
3          1.1.1.1/32
300016     2.2.2.2/32
300032     3.3.3.3/32
300048     4.4.4.4/32
300064     5.5.5.5/32
====================================================

Traceroute packets from r1 to r5

enugadi@m7i# run traceroute 5.5.5.5 logical-router r1
traceroute to 5.5.5.5 (5.5.5.5), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1  10.0.0.2 (10.0.0.2)  1.482 ms  1.146 ms  1.280 ms
MPLS Label=299920 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
2  11.0.0.2 (11.0.0.2)  1.309 ms  1.180 ms  1.193 ms
MPLS Label=300128 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
3  12.0.0.2 (12.0.0.2)  1.360 ms  1.238 ms  1.343 ms
MPLS Label=299968 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
4    5.5.5.5 (5.5.5.5)  1.199 ms  1.231 ms  1.146 ms

Router r1 push label 299920 on the packet destination to r5.
Let’s we check the label assignment in the router r1.

enugadi@m7i# run show ldp path 5.5.5.5 logical-router r1
Output Session (label)          Input Session (label)
2.2.2.2:0(300064)               2.2.2.2:0(299920)
Attached route:  5.5.5.5/32, Ingress route

Let’s we check the swap label in the r2 router:

enugadi@m7i# run show route table mpls.0 logical-router r2 | find 299920
299920             *[LDP/9] 01:08:29, metric 1
                    > to 11.0.0.2 via ge-0/0/0.2, Swap 300128

Router r2 swaps the label 299920 to 300128. It matches with packet no.2.

Lets do and check label swapping in the router r4.

enugadi@m7i# run show route table mpls.0  | find 300128
300128             *[LDP/9] 01:10:07, metric 1
                    > to 12.0.0.2 via ge-0/0/2.0, Swap 299968

Router R4 swaps the label 300128 to 299968. It matches with the packet no.4.

Lets check what r4 done to packet with label 299968

enugadi@m7i# run show route table mpls.0 logical-router r4 | find 299968
299968             *[LDP/9] 01:11:43, metric
                    > to 13.0.0.2 via ge-0/0/0.5, Pop

As expected, router r4 do POP label.

LDP you can detect and monitoring amount of traffic to specific destination.
It’s called with traffic-statistic knob, which is available under protocols ldp stanza.

enugadi@m7i# show protocols ldp
traceoptions {
file ldp;
flag label detail;
flag path detail;
}
traffic-statistics { <- this one
file ldp-stats;
interval 60;
}
interface ge-0/0/1.2;
interface ge-0/0/2.0;
interface lo0.0;

You will need to enable this knobs in the transit router, usually on P routers.

enugadi@m7i# run show ldp traffic-statistics
FEC                  Type                Packets              Bytes    Shared
1.1.1.1/32          Transit                   0                  0    No
Ingress                   0                  0    No
2.2.2.2/32          Transit                   0                  0    No
Ingress                   6                480    No
4.4.4.4/32          Transit                   0                  0    No
Ingress                   3                258    No
5.5.5.5/32          Transit                   0                  0    No
Ingress                   0                  0    No

Do ping from r1 (1.1.1.1) to r5 (5.5.5.5) and monitor the traffic in the transit LSR r3.

enugadi@m7i# run ping 5.5.5.5 logical-router r1 source 1.1.1.1 rapid count 1000
PING 5.5.5.5 (5.5.5.5): 56 data bytes
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — snipped —-
— 5.5.5.5 ping statistics —
1000 packets transmitted, 1000 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.076/1.345/14.311/1.073 ms
enugadi@m7i# run show ldp traffic-statistics
FEC                  Type                Packets              Bytes    Shared
1.1.1.1/32          Transit                1000              88000    No
Ingress                   0                  0    No
2.2.2.2/32          Transit                   0                  0    No
Ingress                  16               1090    No
4.4.4.4/32          Transit                   0                  0    No
Ingress                   8                608    No
5.5.5.5/32          Transit                1000              88000    No
Ingress                   0                  0    No

As shown, traffic statistic indicates the traffic from 1.1.1.1 to 5.5.5.5 is 1000 packets.

Let’s try another packet, send icmp packets from r1 to r4.

enugadi@m7i# run ping 4.4.4.4 logical-router r1 source 1.1.1.1 rapid count 1000
PING 4.4.4.4 (4.4.4.4): 56 data bytes
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — snipped —-
— 4.4.4.4 ping statistics —
1000 packets transmitted, 1000 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.083/1.351/44.441/1.722 ms

[edit]
enugadi@m7i# run show ldp traffic-statistics
FEC                  Type                Packets              Bytes    Shared
1.1.1.1/32          Transit                2000             176000    No
Ingress                   0                  0    No
2.2.2.2/32          Transit                   0                  0    No
Ingress                  37               2362    No
4.4.4.4/32          Transit                1000              88000    No
Ingress                  18               1308    No
5.5.5.5/32          Transit                1000              88000    No
Ingress                   0                  0    No

The packet recorded in the r3 is 1000 to FEC 4.4.4.4.

There is available SNMP OID to map these results and put into nms station.

enugadi@m7i# run show snmp mib walk jnxLdpTransitPackets
jnxLdpTransitPackets.1.1.4.1.1.1.1.32 = 2000
jnxLdpTransitPackets.1.1.4.2.2.2.2.32 = 0
jnxLdpTransitPackets.1.1.4.4.4.4.4.32 = 1000
jnxLdpTransitPackets.1.1.4.5.5.5.5.32 = 1000

[edit]
enugadi@m7i# run show snmp mib walk jnxLdpTransitOctet
Request failed: Could not resolve ‘jnxLdpTransitOctet’ to an OID

[edit]
enugadi@m7i# run show snmp mib walk jnxLdpTransitOctets
jnxLdpTransitOctets.1.1.4.1.1.1.1.32 = 176000
jnxLdpTransitOctets.1.1.4.2.2.2.2.32 = 0
jnxLdpTransitOctets.1.1.4.4.4.4.4.32 = 88000
jnxLdpTransitOctets.1.1.4.5.5.5.5.32 = 88000

[edit]
enugadi@m7i# run show snmp mib walk jnxLdpStatsEntry
jnxLdpFecStatisticsStatus.1.1.4.1.1.1.1.32 = 1
jnxLdpFecStatisticsStatus.1.1.4.2.2.2.2.32 = 1
jnxLdpFecStatisticsStatus.1.1.4.4.4.4.4.32 = 1
jnxLdpFecStatisticsStatus.1.1.4.5.5.5.5.32 = 1
jnxLdpIngressOctets.1.1.4.1.1.1.1.32 = 0
jnxLdpIngressOctets.1.1.4.2.2.2.2.32 = 4140
jnxLdpIngressOctets.1.1.4.4.4.4.4.32 = 2358
jnxLdpIngressOctets.1.1.4.5.5.5.5.32 = 0
jnxLdpIngressPackets.1.1.4.1.1.1.1.32 = 0
jnxLdpIngressPackets.1.1.4.2.2.2.2.32 = 66
jnxLdpIngressPackets.1.1.4.4.4.4.4.32 = 33
jnxLdpIngressPackets.1.1.4.5.5.5.5.32 = 0
jnxLdpTransitOctets.1.1.4.1.1.1.1.32 = 176000
jnxLdpTransitOctets.1.1.4.2.2.2.2.32 = 0
jnxLdpTransitOctets.1.1.4.4.4.4.4.32 = 88000
jnxLdpTransitOctets.1.1.4.5.5.5.5.32 = 88000
jnxLdpTransitPackets.1.1.4.1.1.1.1.32 = 2000
jnxLdpTransitPackets.1.1.4.2.2.2.2.32 = 0
jnxLdpTransitPackets.1.1.4.4.4.4.4.32 = 1000
jnxLdpTransitPackets.1.1.4.5.5.5.5.32 = 1000

June 11, 2008

Internet Parody (Very nice)

Filed under: Sharing — adisubrata @ 1:22 PM

Another nice work :) in the youtube.com

My Favourite Net things.

Its nice.

June 5, 2008

Ranks of most Google word searched (2007)

Filed under: Sharing — adisubrata @ 5:23 PM

“Sex” – Egypt, India, Turkey
“Jihad” – Morocco, Indonesia, Pakistan
“Terrorism” – Pakistan, Philippines, Australia
“Hangover” – Ireland, United Kingdom, United States
“Burrito” – United States, Argentina, Canada
“Iraq” – United States, Australia, Canada
“Taliban” – Pakistan, Australia, Canada
“Tom Cruise” – Canada, United States, Australia
“Britney Spears” – Mexico, Venezuela, Canada
“Homosexual” – Philippines, Chile, Venezuela
“Love” – Phillipines, Austrlalia, United States
“Botox” – Australia, United States, United Kingdom
“Viagra” – Italy, United Kindgom, Germany
“David Beckham” – Venezuela, United Kingdom, Mexico
“Kate Moss” – Ireland, United Kingdom, Sweden
“Dolly Buster” – Czech Republic, Austria, Slovakia
“Car bomb” – Australia, United States, Canada
“Marijuana” – Canada, United States, Australia
“IAEA” – Austria, Pakistan, Iran

You can see detail trends of Google trends here: Google Trends

Put your keywords and see the results :)

I tried put keyword ‘MPLS”, the result is:

—- Indonesia is in number two —— :)

Regions
1. India
2. Indonesia
3. United States
4. Russia
5. Taiwan
6. Colombia
7. China
8. United Kingdom
9. Japan
10. Australia

Blog at WordPress.com.