Life is a Roller Coaster

August 26, 2007

Why you need Tunnel-PIC ??

Filed under: Technical section — adisubrata @ 9:37 AM

On Juniper Networks routers, the encapsulation and decapsulation of data packets into tunnels (GRE or IP-IP—IP in IP Tunneling) is executed in hardware. The data packets never touch the RE. Most other vendors’ routers perform this function in the software running on the route processor. The advantage of doing it in hardware in the PFE is that packets can be encapsulated or decapsulated and forwarded at a much faster rate. Additionally, because the RE does not have to process these packets, routing control processes are not adversely affected.

In order to create tunnel interfaces on a Juniper router, a Tunnel PIC must be installed. The Tunnel PIC serves as a placeholder for the packet memory in the FPC. If a native data packet comes into the router and its next hop resolves to a tunnel interface, the packet is forwarded by the packet-switching board to the Tunnel PIC. The packet is encapsulated in the appropriate header, and the Tunnel PIC loops it back to the packet-switching board. Then it is forwarded out a physical interface based on the destination IP address in the tunnel header.

PIM Register messages encapsulate and decapsulate data packets similarly to GRE tunnels. The PIM Register function is also performed in hardware. A Tunnel PIC is required if a router is going to encapsulate or decapsulate data packets into or out of Register messages. Thus, all RPs and all PIM-SM designated routers (DRs) that are directly connected to a source require a Tunnel PIC.

 

 Quote from Interdomain Multicast Routing.

August 11, 2007

BGP Dampening ? Usefull or Harmfull ?

Filed under: Technical section — adisubrata @ 12:39 AM

BGP Dampening was purposed to keep route stability in the networks. Many ISP used BGP dampening to keep their infrastructure for instability. However, it has side effect. Customers prefix can be damped just because of one link flapping. Some customer prefix can be damped and received penalty from their upstream providers. This makes some problems become hard to troubleshoot and need human interference to clear damping status in upstream providers. Also, it will provides inconsistency route advertisement in the internet.

One of BGP community, RIPE.NET seen this problem and makes some recommendation to avoid those side effects. You can click this link to view the complete documentaton.

Quote from ripe.net:

This Routing Working Group document proposes that with the current implementations of BGP flap damping, the application of flap damping in ISP networks is NOT recommended. The recommendations given in ripe-229 and previous documents [2] are considered obsolete henceforth.

If flap damping is implemented, the ISP operating that network will cause side-effects to their customers and the Internet users of their customers’ content and services as described in the previous sections. These side-effects would quite likely be worse than the impact caused by simply not running flap damping at all.

So ??

Could you to think whats impact of your dampening configuration?

I don’t see the benefits of dampening configuration towards downstream connection.

Blog at WordPress.com.