Life is a Roller Coaster

June 5, 2009

List of JUNOS books

Filed under: Sharing, Technical section — Tags: , , — adisubrata @ 11:14 PM

Here is the list of e-book that you can use to sharpen your knowledge. Please DO NOT ask me for the url links or anything like that.

Most of these books are contains Junos CLI hands-on material, you can use it to learn Junos. Some books are contains IP knowledges that you can use in the global IP design and not only to single vendor.

1. John Wiley and Sons MPLS Enabled Applications Emerging Developments and New Technologies. (June 2008)

ina.jpg

2. The Illustrated Network: How TCP/IP Works In A Modern Network (Walter Goralski 2008)

tcp.jpg

3. JUNOS For Dummies (Feb 2008)

dumm.jpg

4. OReilly JUNOS Cookbook (Apr 2006).

cb.gif

5. OReilly JUNOS Enterprise Routing (Mar 2008).

jes.jpg

6. Wiley,. Designing and Developing Scalable IP Networks (2004)

sin.jpg

7. Addison-Wesley, OSPF and IS-IS Choosing an IGP for Large-Scale Networks (2005)

ospfisis.jpg

8. Addison Wesley – Interdomain Multicast Routing – Practical Juniper Networks and Cisco Systems Solutions (Apr 2002)

multicast.jpg

9. Wiley,. Juniper and Cisco Routing – Policy and Protocols for Multivendor IP Networks (2002)

jc.jpg

9. The Complete ISIS Routing Protocols (May 2008)

isis.jpg

10. Sybex book for JNCIA, JNCIS, JNCIP and JNCIE <— free ebook.

11. Prentice Hall Broadband Network Architectures (May 2007) <– E-Series

bras.jpg

12. Exploring the Junos CLI <— free ebook

cli.jpg

13. Addison Wesley – Juniper Networks Reference Guide – JUNOS Routing, Configuration, and Architecture (Oct 2002).

refer.jpg

14. Juniper Networks Field Guide And Reference (Oct 2002).

field.jpg

Another good books

1. Deploying IP and MPLS QoS for Multiservice Networks: Theory & Practice (The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Networking) by John William Evans and Clarence Filsfils (Hardcover – Mar 23, 2007).
2. OSPF: Anatomy of an Internet Routing Protocol by John T. Moy (Paperback – Feb 12, 1998)
3. OSPF Complete Implementation (paperback) by John T. Moy (Paperback – Jun 22, 2008)
4. Internet Routing Architectures (2nd Edition) (Networking Technology) by Sam Halabi (Hardcover – Sep 2, 2000)

Some books is already old and contains old material.

Please update me if you have another good book to share :)

May 29, 2009

JNCIP-M exam

Filed under: Sharing, Technical section — Tags: , , — adisubrata @ 11:41 PM

In this post I would like to share about JNCIP-M exam (Many people asked me after I posted JNCIE exam in this blog). Of course, without breaking the NDA.

jncip-path.gif

Old Logo

jncip-m-old.gif

New Logo

jncip-new.jpg

JNCIP-M exam concern IGP and BGP topic in the network ISP environment, also basic Junos configuration such as interfaces, SNMP and login set. Sybex book is the best resource to start. No MPLS technology and its variance will be find in this test. You can find the description of this test in this link :

Quote from official website:

“The JNCIP-M certification is designed to validate the networking professional’s ability to configure and troubleshoot common routing scenarios. Throughout this 8-hour practical exam, candidates will build an ISP consisting of seven M-series routers and multiple EBGP neighbors. Successful candidates will perform system configuration on all seven routers, install an IGP, a well-designed IBGP, establish connections with all EBGP neighbors as specified, and correctly configure the required routing policies. Passing the JNCIP-M exam is a requirement for attempting the JNCIE-M practical exam”.

Since this test is concern to IGP and BGP, you have to know IGP protocols such as ISIS and OSPF and BGP (RR and confederation) in details. For the example, No LSA type 5 in OSPF NSSA area, and no LSA type 7 in backbone area 0.0.0.0. ABR will do translation from LSA type 7 to type 5.

Below is the list of point before you take this exam:

1. Typing skill is needed. It would be good if you can exercise with another keyboard type.

2. Pay attention on basic configuration at the first time.

3. All interface must be up and running as expected in the test scenario. I don’t think you will pass if one interface down.

4. Try to make best configuration in each scenario before you are moving into the next scenario. If you still have a remaining time, you can recheck what you have configured, but at this case I recommend you to do one time configuration which is the best.

5. If you get stuck with a question, please understand the idea behind a question. If you still don’t have an idea, move to another question before time run out.

6. If you do not know exactly the question, ask the proctor to clarify. Do not make any assumption !!!

7. Prepare ALL material carefully and make sure that you are ready before the exam. Do not only concern on single topic, I.E you concern on OSPF but leave ISIS topic behind you.

8. Pay attention on BGP and routing policy :)

9. This is not really important, but for me I registered the exam after finishing all topic and ready for the exam. Register the exam after you are ready :)

10. If you finished the exam, try to calculate your score.

11. Understand and know every single topic in BGP, OSPF and all material. Sybex is the best book.

Those points above only give you general tips, but I hope it will useful for you all.

May 27, 2009

When you need to upgrade your software?

Filed under: Sharing, Technical section — adisubrata @ 10:13 PM

My people asking me when they want to upgrade their Junos. Do I need to upgrade to the latest release? That’s very common question asking by many customers.

Personally (this is only in my mind), I’m a kind of person who do not like to upgrade the software. Especially in the big ISP environment when dealing with more than 100 routers.

Software upgrade in Junos is very simple things, you only needs to transfer your file via FTP, and do remote upgrade for just a couple of days. However, I will not recommend software upgrades unless you really needs some features which is maybe only supported in the next release.

Below is the list of what I usually consider before making recommendation for software upgrades.

1. You hit a bugs and has fixed in latest (maybe latest) version.

What can you do if you hit a bugs ? hehe… Nothing perfect in this world.

2. New hardware only supported in the specific software version.

In this case, there is no other choice rather than using supported software to these new hardware (i.e new module, interface card, etc).

3. You need new features that only available in the next release.

Network standards and RFC growth very fast. New technology standard will only supported in the latest release since the RFC is still new. You have no choice rather than using latest release. For the example (today) is ethernet-oam, nonstop-routing, etc.

4. Better software architectures.

Each release of software probably has unique architectures. Latest software somehow has better architectures than the previous one. For instance, memory distribution, mpls code, bgp code etc. You can take an advantages using latest release.

5. Software has reached EOL for a long time.

Btw, this is just my personal opinion and not represent any organization or company.

If you have another opinion, please let me know :)

Let’s make a better world.

April 15, 2009

JNCIE-M Exam

Filed under: Sharing — Tags: , , — adisubrata @ 2:26 AM

Some people asked me to share my experience when taking JNCIE-M exam 2 months ago. In this post I would like to share what I’ve been done before – during and after the exam. Not to break the NDA, I will share my preparation and time management during the exam. JNCIE-M exam is definitely challenging exam for Juniper engineer who works in ISP environment. Most of topic in this exam is covers what we need to build the ISP network, and so its interesting for me when preparing this exam.

Below is the information of JNCIE-M certification path. Passing JNCIP-M exam is required before taking JNCIE-M exam.jncie-path.gif


Old Logo

jncie-old.gif

New Logo

jncie-new.jpg

JNCIE-M exam covers in-dept Junos software and its application. Its cover IGP/BGP/MPLS/Multicast/IPv6/Filtering and L2/L3VPN. It does not cover VPLS/metro, MVPN/Rossen draft topic.

You could see exam topic on Juniper.net website.

My preparation to take this exam was around 6 months, but its not continue every day/week since I had many jobs to be done in customer while preparing this exam. JNCIE-M exam needs real router on several topic, I.E L2VPN, Multicast etc. Single Juniper router with logical router is enough to preparing all topics of this exam. However, many interface needed to support that.

I started preparation using JNCIE Study Guide from Sybex book (Thanks to Harry Reynolds who making this good book). Read it carefully and do debug when facing some issues. This book is best resource to preparing the exam. Beside this book, I’ve also read Documentation CD and Training material (AJNR and AVPN). For me, both AJNR and AVPN is considered as the best training from Juniper :)
I impressed with all peoples who taking JNCIE exam before Sybex book release. Most of them only use documentation CD and RFC beside his/her real world experience.

JNCIE and JNCIP has similar topic in the IGP and BGP section. If you already pass JNCIP-M exam and prepare to take JNCIE exam, my suggestion is do not forget JNCIP topic. You will face JNCIP topic in the JNCIE exam. It would be good if you have a time to read IGP/BGP topic from this book again just in case you need to refresh your brain.
If you will take JNCIP exam, please prepare and understand on each topic carefully, you will need to remember it when taking JNCIE exam. In my opinion, JNCIP is one hardest part in the JNCIE exam :( and much more difficult in the JNCIE exam. You need to understand ISIS/OSPF/RIP/BGP behavior in depth.

IMHO, Sybex JNCIE book alone is not enough to pass the exam. I read from groupstudy.com forum, there is a guy who only prepares the exam from JNCIE book. When he took the exam at the first time, he was surprised with the questions and requirements. He got stuck at many topics and has run out of time before finishing all. Then, He failed!!! I was also get stuck in the BGP requirements, I don’t understand it correctly. I asked my proctor many times just to clarify BGP requirements. So, please be careful, there is a chapters trap during the exam.

At the lunch break, I could not eat anything and only enjoy my cigarettes. I’m not feeling hungry at the moment. I have finished IGP/BGP part in this time, but not 100% verified.

I was finished all topics at one hour before time limit. I have 1 hour remaining time to checked my work and verify everything. Here, I found some mistakes and was able to rectify some issues. Lucky me :)

After the exam finished, I went to restaurant and ate some foods with my friends. I relax at this time.

My proctor is a big guy from Singapore (originally from US), I knew him since 4 years ago at 2005 when he came to Jakarta and gave me some training. His name is Gary Hauser, nice to know you dude, highly appreciated for you!!!

Actually I was stressed before taking this exam. At the last 2 weeks before exam, there was a flood at my house. I have to evacuate my family going to the safe place for two weeks. :(
During that week, I could not prepare it well. Every rain coming, I always stuck and got paranoid. After flood has gone, I have to clean everything. At this situation, I wasn’t too confident to take this exam, but I believe that God blessing me… hehe… thanks God, I have passed this exam. Its a milestone for me.

March 2, 2009

OIXP (7717) leaked to International BGP

Filed under: Sharing — adisubrata @ 2:41 AM

I’ve just surf International BGP routing table and found that OIXP’s ASN has leaked to International.

There are 135 prefix leaked.

I had quick a look who leaked this prefix going to International. ASN 7473 is STiX and so AS 23947 advertising their customer prefix to 7473. However, I think they are missing some configuration in BGP policy.

From CIDR I saw this AS is belongs to Cepatnet.

Quote from www.cidr-report.org:

Report for AS23947

Name

    CEPATNET-AS-ID Internet Service Provider PT.Mora Telematika Indonesia
and…

Report for AS38162

Name

    DELTA-AS-ID PT Delta Nusantara Networks

and…

Report for AS23953

Name

    SCBDNET-AS-ID PT ARTHA TELEKOMINDO

Somebody who know admin of these AS, please tell him/her this situation..

 

 

BGP table version is 0, local router ID is 193.0.4.28
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
              r RIB-failure, S Stale, R Removed
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete

   Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*  116.50.24.0/23   91.103.24.1                            0 42109 41965 41877 20771 174 7473 23947 18351 45309 23953 7717 38162 e
*                   202.12.28.190                          0 4777 2516 7473 23947 18351 45309 23953 7717 38162 i
*                   193.136.5.1                            0 1930 20965 3549 7473 23947 18351 45309 23953 7717 38162 i
*                   195.47.235.100                         0 6881 25512 174 7473 23947 18351 45309 23953 7717 38162 i
*                   202.12.29.64                           0 4608 1221 4637 7473 23947 18351 45309 23953 7717 38162 i
*                   213.200.87.254          10             0 3257 3561 7473 23947 18351 45309 23953 7717 38162 i
*                   12.0.1.63                              0 7018 3561 7473 23947 18351 45309 23953 7717 38162 i
*                   213.179.39.65                          0 16186 31283 3549 7473 23947 18351 45309 23953 7717 38162 i
*                   208.51.134.248        2500             0 3549 7473 23947 18351 45309 23953 7717 38162 i
*                   193.138.164.1                          0 34225 1299 3356 7473 23947 18351 45309 23953 7717 38162 i
*>                  218.189.6.2                            0 9304 7473 23947 18351 45309 23953 7717 38162 i
*                   193.0.0.56                             0 3333 1273 7473 23947 18351 45309 23953 7717 38162 i
*  116.50.26.0/23   91.103.24.1                            0 42109 41965 41877 20771 174 7473 23947 18351 45309 23953 7717 38162 e
*                   202.12.28.190                          0 4777 2516 7473 23947 18351 45309 23953 7717 38162 i
*                   193.136.5.1                            0 1930 20965 3549 7473 23947 18351 45309 23953 7717 38162 i
*                   195.47.235.100                         0 6881 25512 174 7473 23947 18351 45309 23953 7717 38162 i
*                   202.12.29.64                           0 4608 1221 4637 7473 23947 18351 45309 23953 7717 38162 i
*                   213.200.87.254          10             0 3257 3561 7473 23947 18351 45309 23953 7717 38162 i
*                   12.0.1.63                              0 7018 3561 7473 23947 18351 45309 23953 7717 38162 i
*                   213.179.39.65                          0 16186 31283 3549 7473 23947 18351 45309 23953 7717 38162 i
*                   208.51.134.248        2500             0 3549 7473 23947 18351 45309 23953 7717 38162 i
*                   193.138.164.1                          0 34225 1299 3356 7473 23947 18351 45309 23953 7717 38162 i
*>                  218.189.6.2                            0 9304 7473 23947 18351 45309 23953 7717 38162 i
*                   193.0.0.56                             0 3333 1273 7473 23947 18351 45309 23953 7717 38162 i
*  116.50.31.0/24   91.103.24.1                            0 42109 41965 41877 20771 174 7473 23947 18351 45309 23953 7717 38162 e
--- snipped ---
Total number of prefixes 135

Multi-Router Looking Glass
Written by: John Fraizer

March 1, 2009

IPv6 – 6PE

Filed under: Technical section — Tags: — adisubrata @ 4:00 AM

At this post I will try and explain IPv6 over IPv4 island connectivity. You can download the complete configuration at the end of this post.

There are some choices that can be used to connecting IPv6 customer over IPv4 network. Tunnel is one of available choice. Both IPIP tunnel and MPLS tunnel can be used here. Both LDP LSP or RSVP LSP able to deliver IPv6 6PR. However in this post I will use MPLS RSVP tunnel. ISP can use both 6PE or vpnv6.

6PE will be used here.

I use logical router to simulate network in this test.

CE1 and CE2 is IPv6 customer. They connected to ISP which use MPLS in the backbone.

Ce1 connected to PE1 and CE2 connected to PE2. Pe1 and PE2 uses 6PE BGP session.

Two PEs have MP-BGP session to exchange IPv6 routes with AFI IPv6 “value 2″.

Diagram

<--ipv6 (AS1000)-> <---------ipv4 AS(3000)-------> <--ipv6 (AS2000)->
+-----+        +-----+         +-----+         +-----+       +-----+
| ce1 |--------| pe1 |---------|  p  |---------| pe2 |-------| ce2 |
+-----+        +-----+         +-----+         +-----+       +-----+
     10::1/126     192.168.0.0/30   192.168.0.4/30    11::0/126
Loopback address:
ce1: 98::1/128
ce2: 99::1/128
pe1: 1.1.1.1/32
pe2: 2.2.2.2/32
p: 10.10.10.10/32

ce1 advertised 98::1/128 to pe1.

ce2 advertised 99::1/128 to pe2.

Objective:

The objective of this test is connecting CE1 and CE2 IPV6.

Config Clue

1. IPv6 BGP router ID

As mentioned in the RFC 2544, in the IPv6 network (only IPv6), BGP router id need to be specified 32 bit. OPEN message  need to be add on both CEs router.

Quote from RFC 2544:

  "Note that the information referred above is distinct from the BGP
   Identifier used in the BGP-4 tie breaking procedure. The BGP
   Identifier is a 32 bit unsigned integer exchanged between two peers
   at session establishment time, within an OPEN message. This is a
   system wide value determined at startup which must be unique in the
   network and should be derived from an IPv4 address regardless of the
   network protocol(s) a particular BGP-4 instance is configured to
   convey at a given moment."

If you are not configure router ID on CE router, OPEN message will fail.  BGP session cannot established. Debug will show why IPv6 BGP session failed when CE router have no router id.

Mar  1 08:57:35  prime pe2: rpd[3251]: bgp_get_open: NOTIFICATION sent to 11::2+4597 (proto): 
code 2 (Open Message Error) subcode 3 (bad BGP ID), Reason: peer 11::2+4597 (proto): 
invalid BGP identifier 0x0

(CE sent OPEN message with 0.0.0.0 as an ID).

2. Explicit null must be configured on labeled unicast family inet6. By default Junos always advertised ipv6 route with label value 2. This label value 2 use as inner label while LSP label use as a outer label.

Example:

enugadi@prime# run show route 99::1/128 logical-router pe1 detail 

inet6.0: 7 destinations, 8 routes (7 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
99::1/128 (1 entry, 1 announced)

        *BGP    Preference: 170/-101
                Next hop type: Indirect
                Next-hop reference count: 3
                Source: 2.2.2.2
                Next hop type: Router, Next hop index: 591
                Next hop: 192.168.0.2 via fe-1/3/0.1 weight 0x1, selected
                Label-switched-path pe1-to-pe2
                Label operation: Push 2, Push 100016(top)
                Protocol next hop: ::ffff:2.2.2.2
                Push 2
                Indirect next hop: 89d9000 131070
                State: <Active Int Ext>
                Local AS:  3000 Peer AS:  3000
                Age: 33         Metric2: 2 
                Task: BGP_3000.2.2.2.2+2027
                Announcement bits (3): 0-KRT 1-BGP RT Background 2-Resolve tree 1 
                AS path: 2000 I
                Route Label: 2
                Localpref: 100
                Router ID: 2.2.2.2

3. PE interface core facing interface MUST be configured with family inet6. This is used for IPv6 received packet verification.

4. You have to configured ipv6-tunneling on protocol MPLS stanza. This rule is applied both LDP or RSVP signaling.

Configuration

Ipv6 Configuration on PE1

enugadi@prime# show logical-routers pe1 interfaces
fe-1/3/0 {
    unit 1 {
        vlan-id 1;
        family inet {
            address 192.168.0.1/30;
        }
        family inet6;
        family mpls;
    }
}
fe-1/3/1 {
    unit 3 {
        description "PE1 to CE1 IPV6 Customer";
        vlan-id 3;
        family inet6 {
            address 10::2/126;
        }
    }
}
lo0 {
    unit 1 {
        family inet {
            address 1.1.1.1/32;
        }
    }
}

enugadi@prime# show logical-routers pe1 protocols bgp
group ibgp {
    type internal;
    local-address 1.1.1.1;
    family inet6 {
        labeled-unicast {
            explicit-null;
        }
    }
    neighbor 2.2.2.2;
}
group ipv6 {
    family inet6 {
        unicast;
    }
    neighbor 10::1 {
        peer-as 1000;
    }
}

enugadi@prime# show logical-routers pe1 protocols mpls
ipv6-tunneling;
label-switched-path pe1-to-pe2 {
    to 2.2.2.2;
}
interface fe-1/3/0.1;

Configuration on PE2

enugadi@prime# show logical-routers pe2 interfaces
fe-1/3/0 {
    unit 4 {
        vlan-id 4;
        family inet6 {
            address 11::1/126;
        }
    }
}
fe-1/3/1 {
    unit 2 {
        vlan-id 2;
        family inet {
            address 192.168.0.6/30;
        }
        family inet6;
        family mpls;
    }
}
lo0 {
    unit 2 {
        family inet {
            address 2.2.2.2/32;
        }
    }
}
[edit]

enugadi@prime# show logical-routers pe2 protocols mpls
ipv6-tunneling;
label-switched-path pe2-to-pe1 {
    to 1.1.1.1;
}
interface fe-1/3/1.2;

[edit]
enugadi@prime# show logical-routers pe2 protocols bgp
group ipv6 {
    traceoptions {
        file debug-ipv6;
        flag all detail;
    }
    neighbor 11::2 {
        peer-as 2000;
    }
}
group ibgp {
    type internal;
    local-address 2.2.2.2;
    family inet6 {
        labeled-unicast {
            explicit-null;
        }
    }
    neighbor 1.1.1.1;
}

Network Verification

enugadi@prime# run show ospf neighbor logical-router p
Address          Interface              State     ID               Pri  Dead
192.168.0.6      fe-1/3/0.2                 Full      2.2.2.2          128    33
192.168.0.1      fe-1/3/1.1                 Full      1.1.1.1          128    33
[edit]

enugadi@prime# run show ospf neighbor logical-router pe1
Address          Interface              State     ID               Pri  Dead
192.168.0.2      fe-1/3/0.1                 Full      10.10.10.10      128    34
[edit]

enugadi@prime# run show ospf neighbor logical-router pe2
Address          Interface              State     ID               Pri  Dead
192.168.0.5      fe-1/3/1.2                 Full      10.10.10.10      128    38

enugadi@prime# run show mpls lsp logical-router pe2
Ingress LSP: 1 sessions
To              From            State Rt ActivePath       P     LSPname
1.1.1.1         2.2.2.2         Up     0                  *     pe2-to-pe1
Total 1 displayed, Up 1, Down 0
Egress LSP: 1 sessions
To              From            State   Rt Style Labelin Labelout LSPname
2.2.2.2         1.1.1.1         Up       0  1 FF       3        - pe1-to-pe2
Total 1 displayed, Up 1, Down 0
Transit LSP: 0 sessions
Total 0 displayed, Up 0, Down 0

enugadi@prime# run show bgp summary logical-router pe1
Groups: 2 Peers: 2 Down peers: 0
Table          Tot Paths  Act Paths Suppressed    History Damp State    Pending
inet.0                 0          0          0          0          0          0
inet6.0                2          2          0          0          0          0
Peer               AS      InPkt     OutPkt    OutQ   Flaps Last Up/Dwn State|#Active/Received/Damped...
10::1            1000         73         73       0       0       31:50 Establ
  inet6.0: 1/1/0
2.2.2.2          3000         55         57       0       0       24:27 Establ
  inet6.0: 1/1/0

[edit]
enugadi@prime# run show bgp summary logical-router pe2
Groups: 2 Peers: 2 Down peers: 0
Table          Tot Paths  Act Paths Suppressed    History Damp State    Pending
inet6.0                2          2          0          0          0          0
inet.0                 0          0          0          0          0          0
Peer               AS      InPkt     OutPkt    OutQ   Flaps Last Up/Dwn State|#Active/Received/Damped...
11::2            2000         84        137       0       1       32:19 Establ
  inet6.0: 1/1/0
1.1.1.1          3000         55         57       0       0       24:28 Establ
  inet6.0: 1/1/0

enugadi@prime# run show route logical-router ce1
inet6.0: 7 destinations, 7 routes (7 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
10::/126           *[Direct/0] 01:16:21
                    > via fe-1/3/0.3
10::1/128          *[Local/0] 01:16:21
                      Local via fe-1/3/0.3
98::1/128          *[Direct/0] 01:16:21
                    > via lo0.50
99::1/128          *[BGP/170] 00:24:49, localpref 100
                      AS path: 3000 2000 I
                    > to 10::2 via fe-1/3/0.3
fe80::/64          *[Direct/0] 01:16:21
                    > via fe-1/3/0.3
fe80::206:2900:3af:b362/128
                   *[Local/0] 01:16:21
                      Local via fe-1/3/0.3
fe80::208:c7ff:fe79:1d02/128
                   *[Direct/0] 01:16:21
                    > via lo0.50
enugadi@prime# run show route logical-router ce2
inet6.0: 7 destinations, 7 routes (7 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
11::/126           *[Direct/0] 01:16:22
                    > via fe-1/3/1.4
11::2/128          *[Local/0] 01:16:22
                      Local via fe-1/3/1.4
98::1/128          *[BGP/170] 00:06:14, localpref 100
                      AS path: 3000 1000 I
                    > to 11::1 via fe-1/3/1.4
99::1/128          *[Direct/0] 01:16:22
                    > via lo0.51
fe80::/64          *[Direct/0] 01:16:22
                    > via fe-1/3/1.4
fe80::200:200:400:4/128
                   *[Local/0] 01:16:22
                      Local via fe-1/3/1.4
fe80::208:c7ff:fe79:1d02/128
                   *[Direct/0] 01:16:22
                    > via lo0.51

IPv6 Verification

enugadi@prime# run ping inet6 98::1 logical-router ce2 source 99::1 rapid count 100 
PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 99::1 --> 98::1
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
--- 98::1 ping6 statistics ---
100 packets transmitted, 100 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 0.419/0.428/0.497/0.010 ms

enugadi@prime# run ping inet6 99::1 logical-router ce1 source 98::1 rapid count 100    
PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 98::1 --> 99::1
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
--- 99::1 ping6 statistics ---
100 packets transmitted, 100 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 0.408/0.427/0.503/0.009 ms

You can download logical router configuration here.
Please drop me an email or comment if you have a questions.
Older Posts »

Blog at WordPress.com.